question archive Exercise 2: The Rhetorical Analysis Prewriting:  The purpose of this scaffolding assignment is to encourage you to look critically and carefully at a piece of writing by another author

Exercise 2: The Rhetorical Analysis Prewriting:  The purpose of this scaffolding assignment is to encourage you to look critically and carefully at a piece of writing by another author

Subject:WritingPrice:13.86 Bought3

Exercise 2: The Rhetorical Analysis

Prewriting: 

The purpose of this scaffolding assignment is to encourage you to look critically and carefully at a piece of writing by another author. You will start by looking at the different essays and articles we have read recently, and you will choose one that interests you.  Re-read it carefully, and prepare to write a rhetorical analysis this text (not only what was said but how it was written).

Writing Task:

First, no matter if you agree or disagree with the author’s ideas, you must make sense of her/his main points by explaining them in your own words. You will start by writing a summary and analysis of the following:

  1. Who is the author and what is their purpose (as far as you can tell) in writing this text? 
  2. Is there any necessary context we may need to know to understand it? Here you might address questions like who the intended audience was and when/where/why the text was originally published (if you can find out), or if the writer is responding to anything in particular, like a social issue or current event.
  3. What is the writer’s position or message?  What does the writing set out to prove to its audience or to make its audience understand? What is the main point (thesis) and main claims
  4. What evidence does the author offer for these claims? What other kinds of support does the text use?

Next, respond to the essay with your own opinions and evaluations of the claims and the rhetoric(not only what it says but also how it was written) 

  1. Do you find the author’s position persuasive?  Do you agree or disagree with any of the claims? Which claims do you agree with and which do you find problematic?
  2. Are there any problems with the way it is written?  Are there issues with structure/organization, tone, or word choice? On the other hand, if you admire the way the text was written, how does the essay’s structure, tone, and word choice help to support the author’s thesis? 
  3. What are your views and thoughts on this topic? How do they relate to the ideas expressed in the author’s text? How might all this connect to your essay topic or other issues you are interested in?

 

pur-new-sol

Purchase A New Answer

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

Answer Preview

Power of Language

Amy Tan's novel "Mother Tongue" is a tale about Tan's relationship with her mother. Chinese and American cultures are contrasted and contrasted with each other in this article. She uses her own writing style to establish a link between these two civilizations because she believes that language possesses unfathomable power, which she believes to be true. Tan wants to dispel the notion that Asians are incapable of succeeding in the liberal arts but thrive in mathematics and science, which he believes is false. She loves writing papers since it allows her to share her thoughts with others. Besides that, she stresses the need to catch other people's attention in the World and improve one's own life to succeed. Her contacts with her mother, particularly the way her mother communicates in English, are discussed in detail. Amy Tan makes a passing mention of her mother's "bad English" in an article. Even though Tan speaks English quite well, she always understood what her mother was saying when she talked in broken English. Tan demonstrates the power of language through archetypes, comedy, pathos, and conversation, demonstrating how you can use it to express your feelings and experiences to others in various situations.

At the story's opening, Tan points out that she does not wish to be a scholar but rather a writer, as she cannot tell us more than "personal views on English in this country or others" (466). Her intention is obviously to express her emotions in how she learned English in school, but she can also speak the same poor English as her mama.

She utilizes an archetype to describe "the power of words" as "the way that an emotion, a visual picture, a complicated concept, or a basic fact may be evoked." The significance of this declaration is that linguistic uses are diverse. All have a mother tongue and utilize it in their everyday lives and how to harness the language's power to help you succeed. We should know how to convince others, create a presentation, teach people additional information from their studies, etc. "Language is my trade instrument. And I utilize them all the English with which I grew up." My business here alludes to her writing. Language has become an essential element of her existence. It is helpful in her work, and she continues to use it in her next life. We have the responsibility to study our mother tongue and other languages well (Amy, 291). We can observe that she utilizes "English" in the plural form, revealing that English may have many conditions or speaking methods in her thoughts. "English" implies for Tan that one is Chinese-English, while the other is flawless English. I discover that in our lives, language is necessary. Regardless of the language we use, the most important thing is that you can communicate emotions effectively to others and then utilize the power of words. The way she grew up is how she wants to get accustomed. We have to accept whatever we have and strive to enhance it if we can.

The position of the author is compelling because it shows us the power of language. I fully agree with her that language of the opinion is a powerful tool on which we rely in our daily routines. The author uses a very persuasive tone with excellent word choice. I believe that this essay is intended to teach people that there is no correct kind of English and that the hat English comes in various forms; therefore, no bias should exist.