Aviation Investigations – Methodology   Activity One- Using the questions below as a guide, write down your methodology in your own words keeping it simple and easy to understand     COVER ALL 5 Design- What type of research did you use and why?   Construction- What different types of research did you collect?   How did you find research? Where did you find it? What were your search terms?   Sample - What research was better than others & why do you think that? Did you have some criteria?   Procedure - What did you do with the research- how did you summarise and organise it? Did you follow a process?   Data Analysis - What do you plan do with all this research?               Activity Two- Read through the methodology below and mark the methodology below based on the following grading criteria   Based on the criteria below give the methodology an overall grade / 2 x strengths / 2 x areas for improvement   Grade Unsatisfactory (29% and below) Weak (Fail- 39% and below) Basic (40%-49%) Competent (50%-59%) Good/ Very Good (60%-69%) Excellent (70%-100%) Methodology Criteria Not attempted Unclear Methodology Plan Sufficient detail to suggest how data can be gathered and used Most sections of methodology included

Subject:PsychologyPrice: Bought3

Share With

Aviation Investigations – Methodology

 

Activity One- Using the questions below as a guide, write down your methodology in your own words keeping it simple and easy to understand

 

 

COVER ALL 5

Design- What type of research did you use and why?

 

Construction- What different types of research did you collect?

 

How did you find research? Where did you find it? What were your search terms?

 

Sample - What research was better than others & why do you think that? Did you have some criteria?

 

Procedure - What did you do with the research- how did you summarise and organise it? Did you follow a process?

 

Data Analysis - What do you plan do with all this research?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Activity Two- Read through the methodology below and mark the methodology below based on the following grading criteria

 

Based on the criteria below give the methodology an overall grade / 2 x strengths / 2 x areas for improvement

 

Grade	Unsatisfactory (29% and below)	Weak (Fail- 39% and below)	Basic (40%-49%)	Competent (50%-59%)	Good/ Very Good (60%-69%)	Excellent (70%-100%)
Methodology Criteria	Not attempted	Unclear Methodology Plan	Sufficient detail to suggest how data can be gathered and used	Most sections of methodology included. Reasonable decisions/planning evident. Sufficient detail for someone else to carry out the research	All 5 sections of methodology covered. Some justification of choices made	All 5 sections of methodology covered. Detailed justification of choices with supporting references

 

Key questions to ask yourself when marking the methodology-

 

· Does the methodology make sense? Can you understand it?

· Does the methodology have a structure?

· Does the student support their understanding of subjects with relevant theory, definitions and references?

· Does the methodology include references / justification of research methods used?

· Is there a set inclusion/exclusion criteria?

· Does the student explain how the research conducted will filter into further research?

 

Methodology: Secondary quantitative/qualitative

 

Research Design- For the literature review, secondary research was used as it is readily available and much easier to gain access to. Secondary research can be cross-referenced which provides quality supporting data making it the best choice of research design. Qualitative data concentrates on studies, theories, statements, reflecting topics needed for certain age groups. According to Easterby-Smith, Thorpe, Jackson, and Lowe, philosophical thinking is fundamental to the conception of a research design and can influence the quality of the research process and the outcome. Furthermore, quantitative data is very useful too as the customer will benefit from various statistics. Secondary information is included to support qualitative and quantitative data by supporting evidence of theories relating to objectives that best suites areas of development. It was also the smarter choice as primary research involves a more hands on approach which would take much more time and isn’t a guarantee of the data you might need. The type of data collected for the literature review was both qualitative and quantitative data however the majority of the data was qualitative. There was no specific reason why qualitative data was used other than the information came from the library where the majority of data is books.

 

 

Method of construction: Throughout this review, the types of sources used to find the secondary data were academic textbooks, websites and some journal articles. These are all recommended sources used as they have reliable and credible information which cannot be questioned. The information collected in the secondary had to be considered carefully as some of these sources of information may have been biased. Online resources are easily accessible as it contains masses of information for a consumer. Books, journals, and official documents are very trustworthy, compared to blogs, adverts, and articles. Reason being is they can be misleading with little information to support their credibility. The search terms used for the collection of data were mixed and a variety of terms were used to generate effective results.

 

 

Sampling: The filters used to find the parameters for the research of the secondary sources are non-biased and based on the quality of the information, the validity of it – when the information was written. The suitability and reliability are also imperative to the sample as the information has to be relevant as well as useful to the research you are conducting. In terms of tourism, a lot of the information is legislation and regulations which were made quite recently and so the credibility will need to be checked using a set inclusion-exclusion criteria. The main filters used for data collection was date of publication and sources must be related to pop-up tourism.

 

 

Procedure: In terms of this research review, the ordering of the data used was done chronologically. This means it is put in order of when the article or website was published. For the literature review, the sources used are put in chronological order according to their year of publication. After this, Lots of Ideas were identified by reading the sources which were used to create an audit where different destinations were compared.

 

 

Analysis:

Data analysis helps to summarise and discover useful information in order to suggest recommendations. This is the process in which you interpret and summarise the data you have found. In terms of this literature review, the information used was used because of its common themes and how the data was put together in the first place.

 

 

 

Methodology Grade-

 

 

 

2 x Areas of Strength

 

 

 

 

 

 

2 x Areas for Improvement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1. Applied Sciences
2. Architecture and Design
3. Biology
4. Business & Finance
5. Chemistry
6. Computer Science
7. Geography
8. Geology
9. Education
10. Engineering
11. English
12. Environmental science
13. Spanish
14. Government
15. History
16. Human Resource Management
17. Information Systems
18. Law
19. Literature
20. Mathematics
21. Nursing
22. Physics
23. Political Science
24. Psychology
25. Reading
26. Science
27. Social Science

• Home
• Homework Answers
• Blog
• Archive
• Tags
• Reviews
• Contact
• •  
  •  

Copyright © 2022 SweetStudy.com