question archive Given: g(x):R---->R is continuous g(0)=1 Show that if there exists a +ve no
Subject:MathPrice:2.84 Bought3
Given:
g(x):R---->R is continuous
g(0)=1
Show that if there exists a +ve no. 'a' where g is zero..i.e. g(a)=0, then there exists a smallest +ve no. 'k' where g(k)=0.
Hint: Consider the set of all positive x where g(x)=0
Note: This is the complete question,Concepts which may be used: Convergence of sequences and Continuity of a function.
We will prove it by contradiction . We will assume that there does not exist smallest positive number ?k? such that ?g(k)=0? .
Then we will construct a sequence ?{xn?}? converges to ?0? such that ?g(xn?)=0? for all ?n∈N? .
Then using sequential criterion of continuity we will prove that ?g(0)=0? which will be a contradiction to ?g(0)=1? .
Then we can conclude that there exist smallest positive number ?k? such that ?g(k)=0? .
Step-by-step explanation
?g:R→R? be a continuous function such that ?g(0)=1? and there exist ?a>0? such that ?g(a)=0? . We will prove by contradiction that there exist smallest positive number ?k? such that ?g(k)=0? .
Suppose there does not exist smallest positive number ?k? such that ?g(k)=0? then for all ?r>0? there exist ?k<r? such that ?g(k)=0? .
For all ?n∈N? if we choose ?r=n1?>0? then there exist ?0<? ?k<r? such that ?g(k)=0? call it ?xn?? that is ?g(xn?)=0? .
So for all ?n∈N? , ?0<xn?<n1??
Taking limit both side we get ,
?0≤limn→∞?xn?≤limn→∞?n1??
?⇒0≤limn→∞?xn?≤0?
?⇒limn→∞?xn?=0? , by sandwich lemma .
As ?g(xn?)=0? for all ?n∈N? so the sequence ?{g(xn?)}? converges to ?0? .
As ?{xn?}? converges to ?0? and ?g? is continuous so the sequence ?{g(xn?)}? converges to ?g(0)? . But since ?{g(xn?)}? converges to ?0? so by uniqueness of limit ?g(0)=0? , a contradiction to ?g(0)=1? .
Hence there exist smallest positive number ?k? such that ?g(k)=0? .