question archive 1) More money is spent on transportation than on food or education by most American families

1) More money is spent on transportation than on food or education by most American families

Subject:CommunicationsPrice: Bought3

1) More money is spent on transportation than on food or education by most American families. - Most American families spend more money on transportation than on food or education. - Transportation spends more money than food or education in most American families. - No change2. If people use cars for transportation, they usually spend between one-fifth and one-third of their income on automobile-related expenses. - If people used cars for transportation, they could usually spend between one-fifth and one-third of their income on automobile-related expenses. - If people use cars for transportation, they would usually spend between one-fifth and one-third of their income on automobile-related expenses. - No change3. Cars are loved by Americans, but cars are expensive to buy, maintain, and operate. - Cars are loved by Americans, but buying, maintaining, and operating cars is expensive. - Americans love cars, but cars are expensive to buy, maintain, and operate. - No change4. In spite of the cost, the car is the most common method of transportation for the vast majority of American adults. - In spite of the cost, the vast majority of American adults use cars as the most common method of transportation. - In spite of the cost, the most common method of transportation for the vast majority of American adults is the car.- No change5. If people would have more alternatives to cars, the cost of transportation would decrease. - If people have more alternatives to cars, the cost of transportation would decrease. - If people had more alternatives to cars, the cost of transportation would decrease. - No change6. Public transportation would serve more people outside of urban areas if sprawl was not so widespread. - Public transportation would serve more people outside of urban areas if sprawl were not so widespread. - Public transportation would serve more people outside of urban areas if sprawl would not be so widespread. - No change7. The layout of many suburban areas requires that a person has access to a car. - The layout of many suburban areas requires that a person have access to a car. - The layout of many suburban areas requires that a person had access to a car. - No change8. Many suburbs today are so car-oriented that they are even designed without sidewalks. - Many suburbs today are so car-oriented that suburb designers even design them without sidewalks. - Many suburbs today are so car-oriented that they even design them without sidewalks.- No change9. If suburban residences are closer to the places where people work and shop, bicycles and buses are more attractive alternatives to cars. - If suburban residences had been closer to the places where people work and shop, bicycles and buses would have been more attractive alternatives to cars. - If suburban residences were closer to the places where people work and shop, bicycles and buses would be more attractive alternatives to cars. - No change10. Solving the transportation problem for American families would have been easier if so much of American life was not planned around cars for decades. - Solving the transportation problem for American families would have been easier if so much of American life would not have been planned around cars for decades. - Solving the transportation problem for American families would have been easier if so much of American life had not been planned around cars for decades. - No change

pur-new-sol

Purchase A New Answer

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

Related Questions