question archive Final Exam – Bayou City Real Estate Investment (150 Points) Mr
Subject:AccountingPrice:18.99 Bought3
Final Exam – Bayou City Real Estate Investment (150 Points)
Mr. Aristotle is a Vice President at Bayou City Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) and he has presented a proposal to the board to consider an investment of $200 million in the Houston market. To support his recommendation, Mr. Aristotle had a forecast model developed for the Houston rental market. Venus, a Financial Analyst at Bayou City, presented a regression model to forecast the average rent in the Houston market with an R-square of 0.9918 and said, “We can confidently invest in the Houston market because we have a ‘perfect’ model to predict future rents.” The REIT’s board wants to conduct further analysis and has hired your Consulting team to evaluate the proposal and Venus’ model.
Venus used a number of predictive variables in her regression model. She included Vacancy Rate (percentage of rental properties that are vacant) and Renter Fraction (percentage of renting households as a fraction of total households). She also included home sales data like the median and average home sales price and number of single-family home sales. Lastly, she included the WTI crude price and unemployment rate bringing the total to seven (7) predictor variables. Table 1 shows the data used by Venus to develop her multiple regression model.
Year |
Average Rent |
Vacancy Rate |
Renter Fraction |
Total property sales |
Average Home Sales Price |
Home Median Sales Price |
WTI_Crude Price |
Unemployment Rate |
2019 |
$1,176 |
8.59% |
39.92% |
102,593.00 |
$305,959 |
$245,000 |
56.99 |
3.8 |
2018 |
$1,150 |
9.49% |
39.70% |
98,323.00 |
$298,982 |
$237,500 |
64.94 |
4.4 |
2017 |
$1,091 |
9.73% |
39.26% |
94,818.00 |
$291,340 |
$229,900 |
50.80 |
5.0 |
2016 |
$1,084 |
7.28% |
40.83% |
91,530.00 |
$283,133 |
$221,000 |
43.29 |
5.3 |
2015 |
$1,069 |
6.46% |
41.33% |
88,764.00 |
$280,290 |
$212,000 |
48.66 |
4.6 |
2014 |
$1,020 |
7.13% |
40.94% |
91,439.00 |
$270,182 |
$199,000 |
93.17 |
5.0 |
2013 |
$964 |
8.39% |
39.87% |
88,080.00 |
$248,591 |
$180,000 |
97.98 |
6.1 |
2012 |
$956 |
10.17% |
38.65% |
74,116.00 |
$225,330 |
$164,500 |
94.05 |
6.6 |
2011 |
$941 |
11.64% |
38.44% |
63,606.00 |
$213,723 |
$155,000 |
94.88 |
8.1 |
2010 |
$961 |
13.76% |
37.16% |
61,005.00 |
$211,765 |
$153,990 |
79.48 |
8.3 |
2009 |
$984 |
12.27% |
37.74% |
63,803.00 |
$203,626 |
$153,000 |
61.95 |
7.5 |
2008 |
$971 |
12.55% |
36.63% |
69,336.00 |
$208,266 |
$152,000 |
99.67 |
4.8 |
2007 |
$924 |
13.57% |
36.12% |
83,736.00 |
$206,393 |
$152,000 |
72.34 |
4.3 |
2006 |
$913 |
10.91% |
36.52% |
87,574.00 |
$198,410 |
$149,079 |
66.05 |
5.1 |
The Bayou City board was concerned about the predictive nature of the variables chosen by Venus and whether they were truly independent. They also question why some of the variables were considered good predictors of Houston rents. Venus was confident because her model had an excellent R-square and the F-statistic was well above the 4.0 required to be considered a good model. Venus’ regression results are shown in Table 2. Mr.
Aristotle was initially happy with the model, but he started to waver under the questioning of some of the board members. He thought an independent evaluation would help determine if the model was as good as it looked and whether they could predict Houston rents effectively.
SUMMARY OUTPUT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regression Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple R |
0.9918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R Square |
0.9837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted R Square |
0.9648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard Error |
15.9316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Observations |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANOVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
df |
SS |
MS |
F |
Significance F |
|
|
|
Regression |
7 |
92154.531 |
13164.933 |
51.868 |
0.0000602 |
|
|
|
Residual |
6 |
1522.898 |
253.816 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
13 |
93677.429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coefficients |
Standard Error |
t Stat |
P-value |
Lower 95% |
Upper 95% |
Lower 95.0% |
Upper 95.0% |
Intercept |
102.9227 |
863.5083 |
0.1192 |
0.9090 |
-2010.006 |
2215.851 |
-2010.006 |
2215.851 |
Vac_Rate |
831.5489 |
1157.9162 |
0.7181 |
0.4997 |
-2001.770 |
3664.868 |
-2001.770 |
3664.868 |
Renter_Frac |
2217.8321 |
2252.2149 |
0.9847 |
0.3628 |
-3293.139 |
7728.803 |
-3293.139 |
7728.803 |
Tot_Propty_Sale |
-0.0027 |
0.0012 |
-2.2613 |
0.0644 |
-0.006 |
0.000 |
-0.006 |
0.000 |
Avg_Home_Sale_Price |
-0.0049 |
0.0023 |
-2.1808 |
0.0720 |
-0.010 |
0.001 |
-0.010 |
0.001 |
Med_Home_Sale_Price |
0.0078 |
0.0021 |
3.6919 |
0.0102 |
0.003 |
0.013 |
0.003 |
0.013 |
WTI |
0.5140 |
0.4053 |
1.2681 |
0.2517 |
-0.478 |
1.506 |
-0.478 |
1.506 |
UnEmp Rate |
-16.3925 |
7.2393 |
-2.2644 |
0.0642 |
-34.107 |
1.322 |
-34.107 |
1.322 |
The Bayou City board made several specific requests of your team to help them assess the model and make a decision on a significant investment in the Houston rental market.
SUBMISSION:
Upload ONE SOLUTION (i.e., an Excel file) per team using the Turnitin Link on Blackboard. List the names of all team members. Clearly show your answers…don’t make me guess or assume I know which cell has the answer.
Purchased 3 times