The following are some questions you may want to address in your critique no matter what type of article you are critiquing. {Use your discretion. These points don't have to be discussed in this order, and some nray not be pertinent to your particular article.) 1. Is the title of the article appropriate and clear? 2. Is the abstract speci?c, representative of the article, and in the correct form? 3. Is the purpose of the article made clear in the introduction? 4. Do you ?nd errors of fact and interpretation? (This is a good one! You Won't believe how often authors misinterpret or misrepresent the work of others. You can check on this by looking up for yourself the references the author cites.) 5. Is all ofthe discussion relevant? 6. Has the author cited the pertinent. and only the pertinent, literature? If the author has included inconsequential references, or references that are not pertinent, suggest deleting them. 7. Have any ideas been ovmmphasizad or underernphasiZed? Suggest speci?c revisions. 3. Should some sections of the manuscript be expanded, condensed or omitted? 9. Are the author's statements clear? Challenge ambiguous statements. Suggest by examples how clarity can be achieved, but do not merely substitute your style for the author's. 10. What underlying assumptions does the author have? 11. Has the author been objective in his or her discussion of the topic? In addition1 here are some questions that are more speci?c to empiricalr'research articles. (Again, use your discretion.) 1. Is the objective of the experiment or of the observations important for the ?eld? 2. Are the experimental methods described adequately? 3. Are the study design and methods appropriate for the purposes of the study? 4. Have the procedures been presented in enough detail to enable a reader to duplicate them? {Another good one! You'd be surprised at the respectable researchers who cut comers in their writing on this point.) Last Edited 4!?!2009 How To Critique A J ournal Article Sponsored by" The Center [or Tudiing and Learning at. U13 5. Scan and spot-check calculations. Are the statistical methods appropriate? 6. Do you ?nd any content repeated or duplicated? A common fault is repetition in the text of data in tables or ?gures. Suggest that tabular data be interpreted of stunrnarized, nor merely repeated, in the text.

Part a

Question 1

Yes, the article's title is accurate and concise.

Question 2

There are no grammatical or spelling errors in the abstract, and it accurately summarizes the article's main points.

Question 3

No, no find errors of fact and interpretation. 

Question 4

The facts and interpretations are correct.

Question 5

Yes, the topic is relevant. Yes, the subject matter under consideration is pertinent..

Question 6

 In other words, only relevant material has been mentioned in this paper. To back up their claims, the author provides credible sources.

Question 7

No, no  any ideas have been overemphasized or underemphasized. 

Question 8

  No, it is not suggested expanding, condensing, or omitting any sections of the manuscript.

Question 9

Yes, the author's statements are clear.

Question 10

The absence of long-term cannabis impacts studies on developing brains is an issue, according to the author. The author assumes that cannabis use is detrimental.

Question 11

Yes, the author's exposition of the subject has been unbiased.

Part b

Question 1

Yes, the purpose of the experiment or the observations is critical to the field.

Question 2

There is a sufficient explanation of the experimental procedures.

Question 3

Yes, the study's methodology and design are suitable for the investigation's goals. Yes, the study's methodology and design are suitable for the investigation's goals. Long-term impacts of cannabis usage on a child's brain development are discussed in this article..

Question 4

A reader should be able to replicate the methods because they have been described in sufficient detail.

Question 5

As far as I know, they're all right..

Question 6

 No, no any content repeated or duplicated

Step-by-step explanation

Part a

Question 1

• The article's title is well-chosen and concise. A dearth of study on the long-term effects of cannabis usage on the growing brain is the main point of this essay.

Question 2

• There are no grammatical or spelling errors in the abstract, and it accurately summarizes the article's main points. There is a dearth of long-term study on the effects of cannabis use in children's growing brains and the potential hazards of cannabis usage, which are summarized in this section.

 Question 3

• Yes, the opening makes it apparent what the piece is about. Yes, the opening makes it apparent what the piece is about. According to the report, very little is known about the long-term consequences of cannabis usage on the developing brain and the associated risks.

Question 4

•  The author cites reputable sources to support their arguments.

 Question 5

• According to the report, very little is known about the long-term consequences of cannabis usage on the developing brain and the associated risks.

Question 6

• Yes, the author has mentioned only the relevant literature, and only the relevant literature has been quoted. In order to substantiate their claims, the author relies on reliable sources.

Question 7

•  No, no ideas have been overemphasized or underemphasized. The author supports their arguments with reputable sources.

Question 8

• No, it is recommended that any sections of the manuscript be expanded, condensed, or omitted in any way.

Question 9

•   Yes, the author's statements are clear. The author supports their arguments with reputable sources. 

Question 10

• Cannabis use's long-term consequences on the developing brain are presently understudied, according to the author, and this is a concern. In addition, he sees marijuana as a potentially hazardous drug.

Question 11

•  Yes, the author has maintained a level of objectivity throughout their treatment of the subject.

Part b

Question I

• Indeed, the objective of the experiment or the observations is crucial to the field... This article discusses research on the lengthy consequences of marijuana usage on the developing brain.

Question 2

• The experimental protocols are well explained. This article discusses research on the long-term consequences of cannabis consumption on the developing brain.

Question 3

• Do you agree with the study's methodology and design? There is no doubt that the study's goals and methods are a good match. This article is an inquiry of the lengthy effects of drugs on the growing brain.

Question 4

• It is possible for a reader to reproduce the methods because they have been provided in sufficient detail.

Question 5

• Yes, statistical methods are applicable in this situation.

Question 6

• No, no any stuff has been replicated or duplicated