question archive You are the fraud investigator on a case and you are certain the VP of Operations has embezzled funds
You are the fraud investigator on a case and you are certain the VP of Operations has embezzled funds
Subject:AccountingPrice: Bought3
You are the fraud investigator on a case and you are certain the VP of Operations has embezzled funds. The VP of Operations has been under suspicion twice before on similar schemes but these suspicions were never proven. Do you think, in this case, it would be acceptable to include evidence from these prior situations in your investigation to ensure an arrest and conviction this time?
