question archive Gender has traditionally been weighed in cases, particularly when children are involved
Gender has traditionally been weighed in cases, particularly when children are involved
Subject:LawPrice: Bought3
Gender has traditionally been weighed in cases, particularly when children are involved. Historically, the chivalry hypothesis has been very observable in the courts subsystem. Of course, times are different and this may not be practiced to the same extent. However, one of the most defining aspects of disparate treatment in the justice system can be considered class. Those who "have" will have a completely different experience in the criminal justice system than those who "have not". Aside from any demographic feature, individuals who "have" (e.g. celebrities) can often afford the best legal counsel and have the system work in their favor to a greater extent. Ultimately, the question is whether the system can mitigate such treatment. Is there a way to make the experience in the system more consistent across class levels? Explain.
