question archive Question: Revision: Question on Sentence annotations (Annotated Bibliography) Given the following 4 sources (Please copy the link and paste, thank you) 1
Subject:ArtsPrice:9.82 Bought3
Question:
Revision: Question on Sentence annotations (Annotated Bibliography)
Given the following 4 sources (Please copy the link and paste, thank you)
1. https://mjm.mcgill.ca/article/view/830/665
By Susan Joanne Wang
Title: Reflections: A Medical Student's Perspective on "Fighting for a Hand to Hold"
Publication: Mcgill Journal of Medicine
2. https://journals.lww.com/jbisrir/Fulltext/2021/09000/Experiences_of_Indigenous_peoples_in_Canada_with.14.aspx
Title: Experiences of Indigenous peoples in Canada with primary health care services: a qualitative systematic review protocol
Publication: lippincott
3. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-its-all-too-common-for-indigenous-patients-to-face-racism-and-neglect/
Title: It's all too common for Indigenous patients to face racism and neglect
Publication: Globe and mail
4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6055798/
By: Tara Horrill
Title: Understanding access to healthcare among Indigenous peoples: A comparative analysis of biomedical and postcolonial perspectives
Publication: US national library of medicine national institutes of health
Questions: For each of the sources (4 sources, long sentences each with the given criteria and references)
Sentence Annotations
(a) - Identify the source and summarize or paraphrase its major conclusion(s), without
plagiarizing or simple quotation. [Note: A topic is not a thesis. Do not merely state the
source's topic.]
(b) - Specify the research/evidence upon which its conclusions are based.
(c) - Explain why, in your opinion, the source meets the Source
Evaluation Criteria (CRAAP Test). These sentences should be persuasive in tone and concise in explanation.
References: https://researchguides.ben.edu/source-evaluation
(d) - Explain how you feel that the information or arguments in this source could be
understood to agree or disagree with the information or arguments in any of the other three
sources for which you are writing annotations.
- Are there any correlation in between the articles when comparing with the others
The Research and Learning Services Department in Olin and Uris Libraries, part of the Cornell University Library, sets the accompanying circumstances for the utilization of the substance of the Guide to Library Research at Cornell Web page and auxiliary or related Web and print pages.
Attribution:
You have our consent to recreate or adjust the substance of this LibGuide for the utilization of you and your understudies, as long as
The wellspring of the substance is obviously ascribed on each page (on the Web or on paper) as:
Olin Library Reference
Research and Learning Services
Cornell University Library
Ithaca, NY, USA
[URL of the page you are using]
You likewise unequivocally state on the page (on the Web or on paper) that you have gotten authorization from us to replicate it and adjust it for your own utilization. (Your perusing and acknowledgment of the circumstances expressed on this Web page is your authorization. You really want not reach us for noncommercial use).
Authorizations are conceded in view of the accompanying:
Noncommercial use: Permission is conceded uniquely for noncommercial purposes. Business use is precluded.
Sharing: You consent to share any item or Web page you produce utilizing our substance under similar states of attribution, noncommercial use, and further sharing.
Connecting: Permission to make a hypertext connect to these pages is additionally conceded.
Consent to utilize this work depends on the states of the Creative Commons Deed, rendition 4.0 in regards to attribution, noncommercial use, and "Offer Alike" reuse. See this Commons Deed for additional subtleties.