question archive 1) As this news items indicates, some healthcare companies are starting to shift clinical services and decision making on medical care overseas, primarily to India and Philippines

1) As this news items indicates, some healthcare companies are starting to shift clinical services and decision making on medical care overseas, primarily to India and Philippines

Subject:NursingPrice:9.82 Bought3

1) As this news items indicates, some healthcare companies are starting to shift clinical services and decision making on medical care overseas, primarily to India and Philippines. Is this a good strategy for these companies? what are the pros and cons of this strategic decision?

2. Who would make a strategic decision of this magnitude in a healthcare company?

3. Is this a strategy that HSos/HSs might adopt?

1. Resistance is often the human response to strategic changes. What can managers do to overcome resistance?

2. Describe the Ps of marketing and their relevance to HSOs/HSs.

pur-new-sol

Purchase A New Answer

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

Answer Preview

I think it can be a good strategy, but it depends on a number of factors, including the specific context and the capabilities of the overseas service providers. Overall, I think it can be a cost effective way to get care that is of high quality and consistent with the company's standards. However, there are some challenges that need to be considered, such as ensuring that the overseas providers have the necessary infrastructure and capabilities to provide the needed services, as well as properly managing the risk associated with these services.

 

There are pros and cons to this strategy. On the pro side, offshoring clinical services can save companies money. Additionally, it can help them to improve their quality of care by giving them access to more experienced and qualified clinicians. However, on the con side, offshoring clinical services can be risky. There is a chance that clinical mistakes could be made, which could lead to patient injuries or even deaths. Additionally, offshoring clinical services can cause patient data to be compromised, which could result in privacy breaches. Ultimately, whether or not offshoring clinical services is a good strategy for a healthcare company depends on a variety of factors, including the company's specific needs and goals. 
 

Healthcare companies are increasingly looking to manage costs by outsourcing clinical services and decision making on medical care overseas, primarily to India and the Philippines. While this may be a good strategy for some companies, there are a number of factors that need to be considered before making this decision. One of the biggest factors to consider is the quality of care that is being offered. It is important to make sure that the country you are outsourcing to has qualified healthcare professionals and up-to-date medical facilities. Otherwise, you may be putting the health of your patients at risk. Another factor to consider is the cost of outsourcing. While it may be cheaper to outsource services to a foreign country, you need to make sure that the savings are worth the risk. Outsourcing healthcare services can be risky if the quality of care is not up to par. Additionally, there may be cultural differences that can make communication difficult. Make sure you have a plan in place for managing these risks before making the decision to outsource.

 

Who would make a strategic decision of this magnitude in a healthcare company?

Strategic decisions in healthcare companies are typically made at the executive level, by those with the authority to make such decisions. In this case, it is likely that the decision to outsource clinical services and decision making on medical care overseas was made by the company's CEO or other senior executives. 

 

There can be a variety of reasons why a healthcare company might decide to outsource clinical services and decision making on medical care overseas. Perhaps the company is looking to save money by sending these activities to countries where the cost of labor is lower. Alternatively, the company may believe that the quality of care provided in India or the Philippines is superior to what is available in the United States. Finally, the company may simply be unable to staff its clinics adequately with qualified personnel and see outsourcing as a way to fill the gap. Whatever the reason, it is important to weigh the pros and cons of outsourcing clinical services before making a decision. On the plus side, outsourcing can save the company money on labor costs and may lead to improved quality of care. However, there are also potential downsides to consider. 

 

For example, outsourcing may lead to a loss of control over the quality and delivery of care, and it may be difficult to track patient outcomes when care is provided in a foreign country. Additionally, there may be cultural differences that can lead to misunderstandings and problems with communication.

 

Is this a strategy that HSos/HSs might adopt? 

HSos/HSs might adopt this strategy if they are looking to save money on clinical services. However, it is important to weigh the cost savings against the potential risks involved in moving services overseas. There are several potential risks involved in moving clinical services overseas. One is that the quality of care may not be as good as what is available in the United States. Another is that there may be language barriers or cultural differences that make it difficult for patients to communicate with doctors and understand their care. Additionally, there may be transportation issues if patients need to travel to receive treatment. Finally, there is the risk that something could go wrong in the overseas clinic and patients would not have the same legal protections they would have if they were treated in the United States. 
 

Resistance is often the human response to strategic changes. What can managers do to overcome resistance?

There are a few things that managers can do to overcome resistance to strategic change. One is to ensure that all stakeholders have a voice in the decision-making process and that their concerns are heard. Managers can also communicate the rationale for the change and emphasize the benefits that it will bring. They can also provide support and help to those who are affected by the change. Finally, they can ensure that the change is implemented in a timely and orderly fashion. For example, managers can ensure that all stakeholders have a voice in the decision-making process by holding meetings and consultations with them. They can also communicate the rationale for the change and emphasize the benefits that it will bring, such as improved efficiency or reduced costs. Managers can provide support and help to those who are affected by the change, for example by providing information or assistance with transitioning to the new system. Finally, they can ensure that the change is implemented in a timely and orderly fashion, for example by setting deadlines and creating a plan for implementing the change. 
 

 

For instance, suppose a company is considering a new strategy that will require employees to work longer hours. The employees may resist this change, fearing that they will have to work too hard and will not have enough time for their personal lives.  The manager can communicate with the employees and explain the rationale for the change. They can emphasize that the new strategy will bring benefits such as increased productivity and profitability. They can also ensure that the change is implemented in a timely and orderly fashion, so that the employees will not feel overwhelmed. 


The Ps of marketing and their relevance to HSOs/HSs.

The Ps of marketing are the product, price, place, and promotion. They are all important for HSOs/HSs to consider when marketing their services. The product is what the HSO/HS offers, and it needs to be something that meets the needs of the target market. The price is how much the HSO/HS charges for its services, and it needs to be affordable for the target market. The place is where the HSO/HS offers its services, and it needs to be accessible to the target market. The promotion is how the HSO/HS advertises and promotes its services, and it needs to be effective in reaching the target market.

 

1. Product: The product is the good or service that the organization provides. The product must be something that customers want and need. 

 

2. Price: The price is how much the customer pays for the product. The price must be fair and competitive. 

 

3. Place: The place is where the product is sold. The place must be convenient for the customer. 

 

4. Promotion: The promotion is how the product is marketed to the customer. The promotion must be persuasive and accurate.

Step-by-step explanation

There are a few things to consider when assessing whether or not moving clinical services overseas is a good strategy for a healthcare company. First, it is important to weigh the cost savings against the potential risks involved in moving services overseas. Some of the risks include quality control issues, cultural differences that could impact patient care, and potential language barriers. Additionally, companies should make sure that the foreign country they are working with has adequate infrastructure to support their needs, such as hospitals, laboratories, and qualified staff. 

Related Questions