If discovery is not allowed in some instances or some courts, why might that be?

 

Please provide citations

If discovery is not allowed in some instances or some courts, why might that be?

1). Few document discoveries arises in courts

In most courts, there have been no evident difficulties in administering the discovery process at the Court during its early discussions. As a result, such observations are made in light of the fact that the Court only has to deal with document discovery on a rare occasion. While interested in hearing from parties about any concerns they may have experienced in respect to the processes established by the Court for discovery of documents in civil actions, most courts do not looking for formal submissions (Cavanagh, 2021).

2). High cost incurred

When it comes to complicated matters under the jurisdiction of the Court, it is most probable that questions of size, expense, and delay will emerge throughout the discovery process. Parties to civil actions, on the other hand, may realize that the advantages of discovery come at a significant cost. However, it is not just the amount spent on discovery that is a source of worry. Instead, it is the perceived poor value for money of the discovery process that has prompted criticism of the process that is, the expense of discovery in comparison to the usefulness of revealed documents in the context of the dispute. Additionally, costly computer software and hardware might be incurred throughout the e-discovery process. Most of the courts learned during the early consultations that the finding of information saved on old backup tapes may need the rebuilding of antiquated technology at enormous cost in order to read the tapes, only to discover utterly irrelevant information as a result of doing so (Echols & Stewart, 2021).

Step-by-step explanation

1) There are very few document discovery cases in the courts.

During the first stages of the Court's deliberations, there have been no obvious issues in handling the discovery process in the majority of cases. As a consequence, such remarks are made in light of the fact that the Court only has to deal with document discovery on a relatively seldom basis, as previously stated. While most courts are interested in hearing from parties about any problems they may have had with regard to the mechanisms established by the Court for discovery of documents in civil cases, most courts do not need written submissions in order to do so.

2) Exorbitant expenses incurred

During the course of the discovery process in complex cases within the jurisdiction of the Court, it is quite likely that issues of scale, cost, and timeliness may arise. Parties to civil cases, on the other hand, may find that the benefits of discovery come at a large financial cost to themselves. There are other factors that are causing concern, not just the amount of money spent on discovery. As opposed to this, it is the procedure's perceived poor value for money that has spurred criticism of the process, which is the price of discovery in relation to the utility of the disclosed papers in the context of the dispute. Aside from that, it is possible that expensive computer software and hardware may be required throughout the e-discovery process. During the first discussions, the majority of the courts discovered that recovering information from old backup tapes may need the rebuilding of obsolete equipment at great expense in order to read the tapes, only to discover completely irrelevant information as a consequence of doing so.