question archive Gilbert et al
Subject:ManagementPrice: Bought3
Gilbert et al. (2016) argue that the Open Science Collaboration (OSC) made at least three errors in their study and consequently the OSC estimate of replicability is pessimistic.
If these "errors" explain replication failure, does this mean psychological research trustworthy or do these errors themselves present new problems for psychological research (i.e., research is NOT trustworthy)? Explain your answer.