question archive Utilitarians argue we should do good: ethics is about evaluating consequences, and doing that which maximizes pleasure and minimizes pain
Utilitarians argue we should do good: ethics is about evaluating consequences, and doing that which maximizes pleasure and minimizes pain
Subject:PhilosophyPrice: Bought3
Utilitarians argue we should do good: ethics is about evaluating consequences, and doing that which maximizes pleasure and minimizes pain. Kant disagrees: ethics is about 'right' and duty, not consequences. The ends do not justify the means! Do you agree with Kant or the utilitarians? Consider a case study, such as harm-reduction policies.
Please help me to write an essay around 1200 words.
