Do you agree with Camus and believe that we must struggle to give our lives their own meaning and accept they difficulties and draw backs that come with that philosophy ?

I do not agree with Camus since for him life lacks all meaning, there is neither a purpose nor a higher objective to satisfy, however, I consider the opposite and I believe that life makes sense, that we have an end that goes beyond the simple satisfaction, difficulties and setbacks. The human being strives to give meaning to life. Some make sense of it by believing in gods, others by believing in science, and others, for example, in love. For Camus these efforts will fail, because for him there is no transcendental end, that is, one that is superior to the individual. He will believe that life is insignificant by itself, that it will only have the value that we want to give it and that we should rejoice for the lack of this ultimate goal and not be desolate, because it allows us to be owners and builders of our life.

This is the philosophy of the absurd. What is a reason to continue alive can also be a reason to die. For example, love for a person can give meaning and fill our life and heartbreak empty it and prefer suicide.

Life is an absurdity since there is no end in it and as subjects we become absurd when we try something insignificant to do a work that goes beyond ourselves.

I believe that human beings do not have the obligation to define the meaning of life in universal terms. Each of us will do it in our own way, starting from ourselves, from our potential and experiences, discovering ourselves in our day to day life. What's more, the meaning of life not only differs from one person to another, but we ourselves will obtain a vital purpose at each stage of our existence. The meaning of life is finding a purpose, in assuming responsibility for ourselves and for the human being himself.

Step-by-step explanation

Camus will believe that life is insignificant by itself, that it will only have the value that we want to give it. The meaning of life is intensely mixed with the philosophical and religious conceptions of existence, consciousness and happiness, and affects many other issues such as symbolic meaning, ontology, value, purpose, ethics, good and evil, free will, conceptions of God, the existence of God, the soul and the afterlife. Also from Humanism and literature are extensive contributions and reflections on these issues.

Scientific contributions are more indirect; By describing empirical facts about the universe, science provides context and institutes parameters for conversations on related topics. An alternative centered on the human being in himself, away from religious or more global conceptions, is the question "What is the meaning of my life?" The value of the question regarding the purpose of life may coincide with the attainment of ultimate reality, or a feeling of unity, or a sense of the sacred. Although here we return to the religious field. However, this ethical-philosophical-religious reflection can lead to the realization of the very futility of life or at least the reflection on the meaning of it. A good example of this type of response is found among authors belonging to Nihilism, a current that takes as its basis the denial of one or more of the supposed meanings of life.