question archive For Chi-square Analysis, if individuals' data sets are statistically significant, but when combined into class data they are not, is this due to a larger sample size? I would think that because there is a larger sample size more data needs to be different from the expected to become statistically significant

For Chi-square Analysis, if individuals' data sets are statistically significant, but when combined into class data they are not, is this due to a larger sample size? I would think that because there is a larger sample size more data needs to be different from the expected to become statistically significant

Subject:BiologyPrice: Bought3

For Chi-square Analysis, if individuals' data sets are statistically significant, but when combined into class data they are not, is this due to a larger sample size? I would think that because there is a larger sample size more data needs to be different from the expected to become statistically significant.

 

pur-new-sol

Purchase A New Answer

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE