Given this case study scenario answer the question below:

Just say in USA the government decided to have universal healthcare for all. They did this by funding the entire cost of healthcare and health insurance in a universal healthcare system similar to the NHS of England. In this theoretical scenario the United States replaces the current free market healthcare into a Universal Healthcare system like the NHS in the UK. This is a theoretical law scenario where legislation has changed dramatically and healthcare is made universal in the United States by the government.

Answer the question as in depth as possible:

1) How would the US government answer criticisms about this system from different parties including political groups, lobbyists, etc in arguing/supporting Universal Health insurance? What would be counter arguments in opposing views of this system?

U.S. government would argue that the system would ensure that every citizen gets free medical care from public heath facilities.

Further, the Universal Health Care System (UHS) would be implemented in corroboration with all levels of government.

The federal government would be responsible for establishing regulations as well as an equitable revenue sharing formulae.

The state on the other hand would ensure that the health facilities have all the requisite personnel and facilities.

The local government would also create legislation based on the existing circumstances to ensure that the system works.

Critics what will be the place of insurance companies? Also, what would be the role of employers providing insurance covers to their employees in such a scenario? Other concerns would be the likelihood of overlapping roles likely to compromise the system.

Step-by-step explanation

The U.S. government would argue that the system would ensure that every citizen gets free medical care from public health facilities. Further, the Universal Health Care System (UHS) would be implemented in corroboration with all government levels. The federal government would be responsible for establishing regulations as well as an equitable revenue sharing formulae. On the other hand, the state would ensure that the health facilities have all the requisite personnel and facilities. The local government would also create legislation based on the existing circumstances to ensure that the system works.

Nonetheless, critics of the system would ask legitimate questions such as the place of insurance companies? What would be the role of employers providing insurance covers to their employees in such a scenario? Other concerns would be the likelihood of overlapping roles likely to compromise the system.