question archive If a call for tenders specifically requires that certain work be subcontracted out, and that the names of subcontractors that the contractor intends to use be given in the tender, why might a contractor intentionally omit the name of the subcontractor?
If a call for tenders specifically requires that certain work be subcontracted out, and that the names of subcontractors that the contractor intends to use be given in the tender, why might a contractor intentionally omit the name of the subcontractor?
Subject:LawPrice:2.84 Bought6
If a call for tenders specifically requires that certain work be subcontracted out, and that the names of
subcontractors that the contractor intends to use be given in the tender, why might a contractor
intentionally omit the name of the subcontractor?
Purchase A New Answer
Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts
GET A QUOTE
Answer Preview
The name of the subcontractor could be intentionally omitted by a contractor because he does not want any subcontractor to participate in the tender. The contractor is extremely likely to be able to do all the work himself and save money by not having the sub-contractor to do the job. If the subcontractor does the job, a portion of the profit must also be made, which will decrease the main contractor's profit.
The greatest drawback of doing this is that since the tender allows the sub-contractor to conduct those works and if the sub-contractor is excluded, there are high chances of cancelling the tender to the main contractor.
