1)What is the significance of the following statement: "The dehumanization of the Tutsis at this level acted as a culmination of earlier assertions in the mythico-history that the Tutsis did not belong to the "nation, in its pure "natural' state." (Malkki p.134)

The crimes committed by the Hutu rebels are classified as representative civilians for the purpose of personal liquidation of the Tutsi community. Probably the main difference from the killing of the Hutu is that the project did not have a chance to be fully realized. But the element of "excellent demeanor'' in the subtitle shows that it is actually not eligible to be regarded as a complete genocide.

Step-by-step explanation

The dehumanization of the Tutsis at this level acted as a culmination of earlier assertions in the mythico-history that the Tutsis did not belong to the "nation, in its pure "natural' state means that :

1. Its widespread and extreme cruelty to all Hutu elites has prompted some commentators to refer to "selective genocide" . However, to this day, scholars still hold different opinions on whether the 1972 massacre should be described as double genocide, selective genocide, genocide or the massacre of ethnic cleansing. Although recent studies provide a lot of data these tragedies even raise many questions.
2. In order to turn the complex drama into the simplest common ground, the vast majority of the victims were Hutu, accounting for about 80% of the total population, about 4 million. The overwhelming majority of the perpetrators are from the Tutsi ethnic group, accounting for about 15% of the population, whose representatives completely control the armed forces and the government.
3. However, not all Tutsi are the perpetrators, nor all the victims Hutu. The Hutu and Tutsi are both victims and perpetrators, but they have different time intervals and different levels of participation. The trigger behind the massacre was a rural uprising led by the Hutu, aimed at seizing the power of the ruling Tutsi. The fulcrum of the rebellion is in the southern province of Bururi, and its leadership is composed of a small group of radical Hutu intellectuals.
4. In a way, it represents an ideology whose main theme is anti-Tutsi militants. In just a few days, hundreds (possibly thousands) of Tutsi died. However, the ensuing repression went far beyond the provinces most directly affected by the violence. Its vengeance swept across the country and lasted for several months after being contained.
5. Hutu and Tutsi; the involvement of former Congolese rebels (simba) or the description of many observers indicate the improvisational nature of the rebellion; the widespread dispersal of the killings and the fragmentary aspects, except for the anti Apart from what the Tutsi slogans may explain, there is a lack of coherent genocide ideology.In dozens of rural insurgents manipulated by several radical intellectuals, the killing of about a thousand Tutsi is on par with the planned extermination of 200,000 to 300,000 Hutu , No matter how many genocide intentions can be read in the anti-Tutsi slogans of the Hutu rebels.