Explain the differences in the methods used for enforcement pre- and post- Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). 

 

Answer:

The methods used for enforcement during pre and post individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) differ. In pre-IDEA, schools were mandated to provide FAPE to all the disabled students. As such, it culminated to the adoption of IDEA, with several advantages considered by courts. Such included attorney fees, compensatory education, monetary fees and the permanent and preliminary injunctions. After the enforcement of post IDEA, things were different. Currently, various methods that often lead to unintentional actions have emerged. As a result, the officials under the post IDEA methods might harm children with disabilities. 

Step-by-step explanation

The Individual with Disabilities Education Act, is a federal law enacted to provide comprehensive protection to students with various learning disabilities. The provisions under this Act include the right to free and fundamental education, the liberty to being placed in an environment which is not overly restrictive, as well as allowing for parent involvement. In a nutshell, the IDEA protects all school-aged pupils that lie within either one or more of the outlined conditions, such as emotional disturbance, autism, visual impairment, speech impairment, learning disabilities, among other medical/health related impairments. Subsequently, after a series of trials were made by courts to act against school officials, a lot more has changed to the present day. The pre-methods mandated the schools to offer FAPE in which IDEA was sired. However, after a while since the execution of the Act, school officials have been reluctant to an extent that students can be harmed despite that they meet the criteria for protection under IDEA. 

References

https://www.wrightslaw.com/law/reports/IDEA_Compliance_1.htm

http://www.ldonline.org/article/6086/

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED588516.pdf