question archive ENSCI 1100: Science,Technology and Society What is the role of the scientific method in the scientific revolution and how was the society transformed by the scientific revolution? Discuss how new observations can lead to changes in the way we view natural phenomena over time How Copernicus influenced modern astronomy by proposing a new paradigm for describing the displacement of earth from the center of the universe? The instrumental view of technology rests on a view of causality
Subject:BiologyPrice:7.87 Bought7
ENSCI 1100: Science,Technology and Society
Answer:
Question 1: What is the role of the scientific method in the scientific revolution and how was society transformed by the scientific revolution?
Question 2: Discuss how new observations can lead to changes in the way we view natural phenomena over time
Question 3: How Copernicus influenced modern astronomy by proposing a new paradigm for describing the displacement of earth from the center of the universe?
Question 4: The instrumental view of technology rests on a view of causality. Differentiate the four Aristotelian causes (4 causes) citing a one peso coin as an example.
One Peso Coin:
Step-by-step explanation
Details:
Question 1: The scientific revolution laid the foundations for the Age of Enlightenment, which centered on reason as the primary source of authority and legitimacy, and emphasized the importance of the scientific method. By the 18th century, when the Enlightenment flourished, the scientific authority began to displace religious authority, and disciplines until then seen as legitimately scientific (e.g., alchemy and astrology) lost scientific credibility.
Question 2: Humans have been observing earthworms and their activities for a very long time. The Ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle referred to earthworms as "the intestines of the earth." Charles Darwin is credited with inspiring popular and scientific interest in earthworms with his book The Formation of Vegetable Mould through the Action of Worms, with Observations on their Habits. Darwin kept pots of soil in his study so he could observe earthworms. He tested their sensitivity to light and heat, observed their food preferences, and even set up challenges to test their intelligence!
Question 3: The contested state of planetary theory in the late 15th century and Pico's attack on astrology's foundations together constitute the principal historical considerations in constructing the background to Copernicus's achievement. In Copernicus's period, astrology and astronomy were considered subdivisions of a common subject called the "science of the stars," whose main aim was to provide a description of the arrangement of the heavens as well as the theoretical tools and tables of motions that would permit accurate construction of horoscopes and annual prognostications. At this time, the terms astrologer, astronomer, and mathematician were virtually interchangeable; they generally denoted anyone who studied the heavens using mathematical techniques. Pico claimed that astrology ought to be condemned because its practitioners were in disagreement about everything, from the divisions of the zodiac to the minutest observations to the order of the planets. A second long-standing disagreement, not mentioned by Pico, concerned the status of the planetary models. From antiquity, astronomical modeling was governed by the premise that the planets move with uniform angular motion on fixed radii at a constant distance from their centers of motion. Two types of models are derived from this premise.
Question 4: Aristotle held that any contingent event (particularly a material event) was explainable in principle. That is, for Aristotle, there are no uncaused contingent events in the universe. Much of his work in Physics and Metaphysics is dedicated to articulating an exhaustive account of causation. He built on Plato and the Natural Philosophers, who had offered various theories to explain the observable universe. However, Aristotle believed all the previous accounts of causation were incomplete; they either failed to account for the rational element that explains order (nous) or failed to account for the natural elements out of which order is formed (phusis). This is commonly known as the hylomorphic composite. The explainable combination of matter (hulos) and form (morphos) is the observable universe.