You are a lawyer representing an unknown client in writing the constitution for a new nation of Freedonia. Argue for either John Rawls’s conception of the Fair Equality of Opportunity Principle (which Nozick would reject if it entails government action to redress inequalities of opportunity) and the Difference Principle or for Robert Nozick’s principles of justice in holdings as part of that constitution. Present arguments for both sides on this position—including especially Nozick’s Wilt Chamberlain example—critique both arguments (based on critiques from readings or class) and provide your own original response to the critiques of the position you support

pur-new-sol

Related Questions