question archive 1) Never let your children play cards
1) Never let your children play cards
Subject:PhilosophyPrice:3.87 Bought7
1) Never let your children play cards. Soon they will play for money, then they will bet on the internet, then they will go to a casino, and in the end they will lose everything.
a. Red herring.
b. No fallacy.
c. Slippery slope.
d. False cause.
e. Missing the point.
2. Nourah's dog had a flea problem. This product from the veterinary helped. Since your dog is the same race you should try the same product. Probably it will also work for your dog.
a. False cause.
b. No fallacy.
c. Weak analogy.
d. Accident.
e. Formal fallacy
f. Hasty generalization.
3. Dear highness (judge). Gonzales cannot be guilty of murder. He lives in the slum not far from here and has a large family to feed. He also has aging parents and a sick sister. They are all very poor. You cannot condemn him.
a. Slippery slope.
b. No fallacy.
c. Missing the point.
d. Appeal to pity.
e. Red herring.
Purchase A New Answer
Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts
GET A QUOTE
Answer Preview
Answer:
- Slippery slope.
- Hasty generalization.
- Appeal to pity
Explanation:
- Slippery slope. Small first steps like playing cards by children may lead to them going to play in casinos and losing everything.
- Hasty generalization. Since Nourah's dog had flea problem and this product from the veterinary used worked was will probably work for you since your dog has the same problem.
- Appeal to pity. It is assumed that since Gonzales lives in the slums and has a big family and his aging parents to feed he can't be guilty of murder.
