question archive BBA222 PROJECT MANAGEMENT – Task brief & rubrics URBANISTIC PROJECT “THE BEST AMUSEMENT PARK FOR KIDS IN THE BEACH AREA OF GAVA” - PROJECT PROPOSAL 2021 Description: The customer comes up to your Project Management company (you are the CEO and a Project Manager) with the request to make an urgent entertaining sports park for kids (3-10 years of age) in the open area of Gava beach as part of important urban development program

BBA222 PROJECT MANAGEMENT – Task brief & rubrics URBANISTIC PROJECT “THE BEST AMUSEMENT PARK FOR KIDS IN THE BEACH AREA OF GAVA” - PROJECT PROPOSAL 2021 Description: The customer comes up to your Project Management company (you are the CEO and a Project Manager) with the request to make an urgent entertaining sports park for kids (3-10 years of age) in the open area of Gava beach as part of important urban development program

Subject:Operations ManagementPrice: Bought3

BBA222 PROJECT MANAGEMENT – Task brief & rubrics

URBANISTIC PROJECT “THE BEST AMUSEMENT PARK FOR KIDS IN THE BEACH AREA OF GAVA” - PROJECT PROPOSAL 2021

Description:

The customer comes up to your Project Management company (you are the CEO and a Project Manager) with the request to make an urgent entertaining sports park for kids (3-10 years of age) in the open area of Gava beach as part of important urban development program. Note, that you can be provided with any help from the local authorities to finish the project on time (permissions, certifications, etc). Make up the project with the following characteristics:

 

· Budget: 63000 euros

· Deadline: June 1st, 2021

· Technical characteristics: should be open spaces and closed spaces

· Customer: Ayuntamiento of Gava

 

· In your proposal you have to use all material discussed in class, especially: making WBS list, showing AON networking for the time duration of the project, propose your resource management and demonstrate the resource implementation, cost management distribution (group time-resource-cost constrains of the project + Gantt chart), risk (RBS) and close/follow up aspects of the project.

 

· You should make references to real names (people, places, etc.) to elaborate your work. Be as creative as possible but control the budget and the deadline.

 

 

Formalities:

· Wordcount: From 1500 to 2000 words.

· Cover, Table of Contents, References and Appendix are excluded of the total wordcount.

· Font: Arial 12,5 pts.

· Text alignment: Justified.

· The in-text References and the Bibliography have to be in Harvard’s citation style.

Submission: Week 13, Sunday 9th May 23:59 CEST – Via Moodle (Turnitin).

Weight: This task is a 30% of your total grade for this subject.

Outcomes: This task assesses the following learning outcomes:

· Describe the need for a project-based approach inside organizations.

· Understand the role of project management as a strategic element inside organizations.

· Critically assess the roles and responsibilities of a Project Manager.

· Evaluate how to select, develop, plan schedule and measure its outcomes and risks.

Rubrics

 

 

Exceptional 90-100

Good 80-89

Fair 70-79

Marginal fail 60-69

Knowledge & Understanding (20%)

Student demonstrates excellent understanding of key concepts and uses vocabulary in an entirely appropriate manner.

Student demonstrates good understanding of the task and mentions some relevant concepts and demonstrates use of the relevant vocabulary.

Student understands the task and provides minimum theory and/or some use of vocabulary.

Student understands the task and attempts to answer the question but does not mention key concepts or uses minimum amount of relevant vocabulary.

Application (30%)

Student applies fully relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class.

Student applies mostly relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class.

Student applies some relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. Misunderstanding may be evident.

Student applies little relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. Misunderstands are evident.

Critical Thinking (30%)

Student critically assesses in excellent ways, drawing outstanding conclusions from relevant authors.

Student critically assesses in good ways, drawing conclusions from relevant authors and references.

Student provides some insights but stays on the surface of the topic. References may not be relevant.

Student makes little or none critical thinking insights, does not quote appropriate authors, and does not provide valid sources.

Communication (20%)

Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely, respecting the time limit and other formalities.

Student communicates their ideas clearly and concisely, respecting the time limit and other formalities.

Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. It may be slightly over or under the time limit. Some formalities are missing.

Student communicates their ideas in a somewhat unclear and unconcise way. It is over or under the time limit and formalities are not respected.

pur-new-sol

Purchase A New Answer

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

Related Questions