question archive Summary and Analysis of Nurse Manager Interview Submission Interview a nurse manager to explore the external factors that influence decision making such as health policy, regulatory requirements, accreditation, and health care financing

Summary and Analysis of Nurse Manager Interview Submission Interview a nurse manager to explore the external factors that influence decision making such as health policy, regulatory requirements, accreditation, and health care financing

Subject:NursingPrice: Bought3

Summary and Analysis of Nurse Manager Interview Submission

Interview a nurse manager to explore the external factors that influence decision making such as health policy, regulatory requirements, accreditation, and health care financing.

1. Provide an overview of the role of the nurse manager interviewed. Summarize the information from the interview (do not report the interview question by question)

2. Perceptions related to impact on health policy on decision. Perceptions related to impact of regulatory agencies on decision making. Perceptions related to impact of health care financing on decision making.

3. Analysis of the interview supported by the literature.

 

Submission Instructions:

· The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.

· The paper is to be no shorter than 4 pages; nor longer than 5 pages in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page.

· Your paper should be formatted per APA and references should be current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions).

·  Incorporate a minimum of 3 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles and books should be referenced according to current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).

· Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

Essay/Paper Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Points

Identification of Main Issues/Problems

4 points Distinguished

Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.

3 points Excellent

Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.

2 points Fair

Identifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.

1 point Poor

Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.

4 points

Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Problems

4 points Distinguished

Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

3 points Excellent

Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.

2 points Fair

Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

1 point Poor

Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

4 points

Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding

4 points Distinguished

Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.

3 points Excellent

Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

2 points Fair

Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

1 point Poor

Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

4 points

Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature

4 points Distinguished

Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.

3 points Excellent

Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

2 points Fair

Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

1 point Poor

Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.

4 points

Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines

4 points Distinguished

Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.

3 points Excellent

Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

2 points Fair

Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

1 point Poor

Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.

4 points

pur-new-sol

Purchase A New Answer

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

Related Questions