question archive Name: Record full reference for article using correct APA formatting: Shelhamer, M
Name: Record full reference for article using correct APA formatting: Shelhamer, M
Subject:NursingPrice: Bought3
Name:
Record full reference for article using correct APA formatting:
Shelhamer, M. C., Wesson, P. D., Solari, I. L., Jensen, D. L., Steele, W. A., Dimitrov, V. G., ... & Baxi, S. M. (2021). Prone positioning in moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19: A cohort study and analysis of physiology. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, 36(2), 241-252. Comment by Hamilton, Alaina J.: THREE TO TWENTY AUTHORS List by last names and initials; commas separate author names, while the last author name is preceded again by ampersand. This is a departure from APA 6, which only required listing the first six authors before an ellipsis and the final author's name. https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_author_authors.html
Table for Individual Qualitative or Quantitative or Mixed Methods Research Study
|
First author’s last name and first initial, year published & article title |
Purpose/ Problem Statement |
Design & level of evidence Comment by Hamilton, Alaina J.: This information tells us that this is quantitative and there is a treatment. Use the library resource to determine level of evidence when there is a treatment without randomization. Abstract - Results: Out of 335 participants who were intubated and mechanically ventilated, 62 underwent prone positioning, 199 met prone positioning criteria and served as controls and 74 were excluded. The intervention and control groups were similar at baseline. |
Target Population
|
Data Collection: Variables, tools, and measurements Comment by Hamilton, Alaina J.: What was the independent and dependent variables? |
Statistical tests Comment by Hamilton, Alaina J.: Add the tests – this is quantitative. Pg. 244 statistical analysis |
Results/Findings |
Implications |
Strengths Comment by Hamilton, Alaina J.: What about how this study was done makes you trust the results? What makes this study valid and reliable? Those are the strengths. |
Limitations |
What recommendations can be provided based on the evidence found in this article? Comment by Hamilton, Alaina J.: Provide the specific recommendations here – 12 to 16 hours for 3 days or something specific that others could pick up and begin trialing as a pilot. |
|
Shelhamer, M. (2021). Prone positioning in a moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome due to Covid-19. |
Determine the benefit of prone positioning in mechanically ventilated patients. · The impact of prone positioning among Covid-19 patients. |
Cohort study design. · Level four evidence.
|
Covid-19 patients with prone positioning. · Covid-19 patients with non-prone positioning. · Right target population was experimented in this study. · Targeted adult patients older than 18 with Covid-19. · Recruited patients from level 1 trauma in NYC. Comment by Hamilton, Alaina J.: Spell out abbreviation |
Stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting (sIPTW) · Fine-Gray competing risk models. |
N/A for qualitative studies.
|
The study found a 40% reduction in the mortality rate of Covid-19 positive adult patients when exposed to 12-16 hours prone positioning. · Increased patient oxygen-saturation up to 3 days and significantly improved there after ( Shelhamer et al., 2021). Comment by Hamilton, Alaina J.: What does this mean? Oxygen saturation is not measured in days · Adults tested positive for Covid-19 should be exposed to a prolonged prone position of 12-16 hours daily. Comment by Hamilton, Alaina J.: The results should be supporting this claim and stating why. · Prone therapy helps in reducing mortality in Covid-19 positive patients. |
Prone positioning has a mortality prevention benefit · >3 days prone positioning is beneficial ( Shelhamer et al., 2021) · Prone position enhances ventilation-pe |
