question archive 1) What was the biggest hurdle when it came to the Annotated Bibliography? How did you overcome that obstacle? What do you feel like you accomplished with the Annotated Bibliography? 2) What did you argue about in your Classical Argument? Why did you choose that topic? Did your perspective about the topic change at all? Why/why not? 3) What is the difference between the Classical Argument and the Rogerian Argument? What was the common ground between both sides? Did the common ground change the way you looked at the overall debate Did it have any effect on your solution? 4) What did you take away from the Toulmin Argument? What did categorizing do for you as a student? Do you feel like you examine arguments differently now? Why/Why not?
1) What was the biggest hurdle when it came to the Annotated Bibliography? How did you overcome that obstacle? What do you feel like you accomplished with the Annotated Bibliography? 2) What did you argue about in your Classical Argument? Why did you choose that topic? Did your perspective about the topic change at all? Why/why not? 3) What is the difference between the Classical Argument and the Rogerian Argument? What was the common ground between both sides? Did the common ground change the way you looked at the overall debate Did it have any effect on your solution? 4) What did you take away from the Toulmin Argument? What did categorizing do for you as a student? Do you feel like you examine arguments differently now? Why/Why not?
Subject:EnglishPrice: Bought3
1) What was the biggest hurdle when it came to the Annotated Bibliography?
- How did you overcome that obstacle?
- What do you feel like you accomplished with the Annotated Bibliography?
2) What did you argue about in your Classical Argument?
- Why did you choose that topic?
- Did your perspective about the topic change at all?
- Why/why not?
3) What is the difference between the Classical Argument and the Rogerian Argument?
- What was the common ground between both sides?
- Did the common ground change the way you looked at the overall debate
- Did it have any effect on your solution?
4) What did you take away from the Toulmin Argument?
- What did categorizing do for you as a student?
- Do you feel like you examine arguments differently now?
- Why/Why not?
