question archive I think the most appropriate response would be to uphold her fathers legacy, that being said if the company isn't financially secure than it's not feasible to pay the full bonuses which is a full months pay

I think the most appropriate response would be to uphold her fathers legacy, that being said if the company isn't financially secure than it's not feasible to pay the full bonuses which is a full months pay

Subject:CommunicationsPrice: Bought3

I think the most appropriate response would be to uphold her fathers legacy, that being said if the company isn't financially secure than it's not feasible to pay the full bonuses which is a full months pay. This being said if they're able to offer bonuses but just for half their original value, this gives some breathing room and is still helpful to employees who need the money. If the company doesn't hold the same values as it once held when Luisa's father was CEO than to her she fails either way. Her worries should come with the manager trying to poach her employees but if they're loyal to the company than a smaller bonus year shouldn't be the deciding factor because next year it can be a bigger bonus. Luisa also has the option to cut the bonus' completely this year so the company can allocate the money for better uses. In response to this the company may be able to get out of its bind and use the 200 million to expand further, the employees who have stayed loyal for so long such as Rosa should be accommodated for their great work in replace of bonuses this year an increase in better benefits for employees which will take less out of their pockets is the least that Superardo can offer during the difficult times such as a better retirement plan which will be beneficial for both the employees as well as the company in the long term.

 

pur-new-sol

Purchase A New Answer

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

Related Questions