Introduction and Instructions

You have recently been hired as the Director of Human Resources for Wilson Brothers Canada and have HR responsibility for all of the company’s Canadian operations. Bob and John Wilson have asked you to prepare a report for their review focusing specifically on organizational behavior within the company. Review the Wilson Brothers Case Scenario in depth and address the required topic listed below in your analysis report. Marks are allocated for thoroughness of coverage of the ten required topics and their analysis-linkages to appropriate OB theories and practices from the course and external sources. It is not enough to just describe the happenings at Wilson Bros. Analysis should include the effectiveness of the current approach for the topics as well as recommendations for improvement in each. Use topic as a heading in your analysis. While there are no page requirements for the analysis report include all relevant analysis and be concise. Remember this is an Executive Summary for the owners of the company.

The topic to be covered, and subjected to analysis:

Work Groups/Teams (The existence of group or teams in the organization and their effectiveness).

Your analysis of the topic should include the following:

1. Describe the current situation for each topic at Wilson Brothers.
2. Analyze the effectiveness of their approach i.e. how it helps or hinders.
3. Make recommendations on how Wilson Brothers can improve.
4. Link your recommendations to specific OB theories/concepts

Answer: As a Human Resource administrator and the Canadian Operation Head of Wilson Bros, I have led an Work group exploration,I have checked on our Current authoritative framework .In my perspective The Wilson Bros work group must be Understand and centred around the accompanying things for the fruitful administration of our Work group. First we centre around the Design and structure of the Work group, It is the essential factor or the foundation of an Work group. Hierarchical Design is a conventional procedure of coordinating individuals Information innovation .Work group structure is the proper position, force and jobs in an association .

Types of Work group structure are :

Functional Work group: In this all the members belong to the same functional area and they respond to a single manager, who is responsible for the management of the whole group.

Advantages:

· Simpler administration of experts.

· Colleagues report to just a single director.

· Comparable assets are concentrated.

Disadvantages:

· Individuals place more accentuation on their practical strength to the impediment of the task

· No vocation way in venture the board

· The task, supervisor has no position

Projectized Work group: These are work groups which an organization creates to implement a specific project until its completion. Afterward, this group dissolves as its objective is achieved.

Advantages:

· Productive undertaking association

· Dedication to the undertaking

· More successful correspondences than practical

Disadvantages:

· No "home" when task is done.

· Absence of polished skill in disciplines.

· Duplication of offices and employment capacities.

· Less proficient utilization of assets.

Matrix Work group : Team individuals report to their undertaking administrator and furthermore to their useful supervisors.

Advantages:

· Exceptionally obvious undertaking targets.

· Improved venture supervisor authority over assets.

· More help from practical regions.

· Greatest use of scant assets.

· Better co-appointment.

· Better even and vertical spread of data.

· Colleagues keep up a home.

Disadvantages :

· Additional work group is required.

· More than one supervisor for venture groups.

· Progressively unpredictable to screen and control .

· Harder issues with asset distribution.

· Needs broad strategies and methodology.

· Higher potential for strife.