question archive Delivery Models Essay - Rubric Collapse All Triple Aim 19
Subject:NursingPrice: Bought3
Delivery Models Essay - Rubric
Collapse All
Triple Aim
19.2 points
Criteria Description
Triple Aim
5. Excellent
19.2 points
The essay thoroughly and skillfully identifies the triple aim as it relates to population health management and delivery models.
4. Good
17.66 points
The essay thoroughly identifies the triple aim as it relates to population health management and delivery models.
3. Satisfactory
16.9 points
The essay identifies the triple aim as it relates to population health management and delivery models.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
15.36 points
The essay vaguely identifies the triple aim as it relates to population health management and delivery models.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The essay does not sufficiently identify the triple aim as it relates to population health management and delivery models.
Current Trends in Health Care Delivery Models
18.4 points
Criteria Description
Current Trends in Health Care Delivery Models
5. Excellent
18.4 points
The essay thoroughly and insightfully describes current trends in health care delivery models.
4. Good
16.93 points
The essay describes current trends in health care delivery models.
3. Satisfactory
16.19 points
The essay thoroughly describes population current trends in health care delivery models.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
14.72 points
The essay does not clearly describe current trends in health care delivery models.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The essay does not adequately describe current trends in health care delivery models.
Quality and Safety
18.4 points
Criteria Description
Quality and Safety
5. Excellent
18.4 points
The essay expertly explains how quality and safety impact delivery models in health care.
4. Good
16.93 points
The essay adequately explains how quality and safety impact delivery models in health care.
3. Satisfactory
16.19 points
The essay soundly explains how quality and safety impact delivery models in health care.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
14.72 points
The essay vaguely explains how quality and safety impact delivery models in health care.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The essay does not adequately explain how quality and safety impact delivery models in health care.
Thesis Development and Purpose
5.6 points
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
5. Excellent
5.6 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
4. Good
5.15 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
3. Satisfactory
4.93 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
4.48 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Argument Logic and Construction
6.4 points
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
5. Excellent
6.4 points
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
4. Good
5.89 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
3. Satisfactory
5.63 points
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
5.12 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
4 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5. Excellent
4 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. Good
3.68 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
3. Satisfactory
3.52 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
3.2 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
4 points
Criteria Description
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5. Excellent
4 points
All format elements are correct.
4. Good
3.68 points
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
3. Satisfactory
3.52 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
3.2 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Documentation of Sources
4 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
5. Excellent
4 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
4. Good
3.68 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
3. Satisfactory
3.52 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
3.2 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.