question archive Each student will submit a review of an article chosen from a peer-reviewed academic journal
Subject:ManagementPrice:9.82 Bought3
Each student will submit a review of an article chosen from a peer-reviewed academic journal. The article must relate to one or more concepts from the textbook ( Crews, D.E. (2021). Mastering Human Resource Management, Version 1.0. Boston, MA: FlatWorld). The article must be no more than five years old.
Use the following questions as subheadings to create your review. You must address the following key questions:
1 - Key Concept: What is the main point or key concept in the article and how does it impact you?
2 - Critical Analysis: How strong is the author's argument? Is the article based upon valid empirical data, or it is based upon opinion?
3 - Application: How might the information in this article impact your role as a current or future manager?
4 - Future Research: What other information would you like to know about the topic?
The paper should be two to three pages in length.
Wei Zhang, Rong-Hui Du, Bei Li, Xiao-Shuang Zheng, Xing-Lou Yang, Ben Hu, Yan-Yi Wang, Geng-Fu Xiao, Bing Yan, Zheng-Li Shi & Peng Zhou (2020) Molecular and serological investigation of 2019-nCoV infected patients: implication of multiple shedding routes, Emerging Microbes & Infections, Coronavirus (Covid sickness 2019) is a type of severe pneumonia caused by 2019-nCoV (2019-nCoV) disease. Since December 2019, it has been discovered in Wuhan, Hubei Province, and has since spread throughout the country. A flare-up pattern was also seen in a few areas of the planet [1-3]. The best quality level for determining COVID-19 is ongoing fluorescence quantitative converse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (turn around transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction,RT-PCR) and viral quality sequencing. Upper respiratory tract nasopharyngeal swabs are currently used as nucleic corrosive location tests in China, however the positive rate is low. Regardless, there are few reports on clinical use of 2019-nCoV nucleic corrosive recognition in other natural examples.
Step-by-step explanation
The East Section of Wuhan University's Renmin Hospital is a COVID-19 medical clinic in Wuhan City, Hubei Province, China. From 2020.1.31 to 2020.2.29., 132 patients were determined to have COVID-19 in the irresistible illness region of the East Section of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. Coronavirus analytic models: based on China's pneumonia detection and treatment methods According to the relevant epidemiological and clinical appearances, nasopharyngeal swabs were ongoing fluorescence RT-PCR location of 2019-nCoV nucleic corrosive positive, COVID-19 cases were partitioned into gentle, standard, serious, and extreme. On confirmation, nasopharyngeal swabs from 132 COVID-19 cases were positive for 2019-nCoV nucleic corrosive, including 72 men and 60 women, with an average age of 66.7 9.1 years, including 80 cases of normal sort, 44 cases of extreme sort, and 8 cases of basic sort. During the confirmation process, nasopharyngeal swabs, sputum, blood, defecation, and butt-centric swabs of COVID-19 cases were routinely collected in the disconnection ward for 2019-nCoV nucleic corrosive recognition under the state of tertiary insurance. According to the standard cycle, all organic examples are repaired and relocated to the research center. The Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention recommended the RT-PCR test units (BioGerm). For all RT-PCR testing announced, a similar specialist and brand of test unit were used; both inner controls and negative controls were routinely performed with each group of tests.
The following are the results of 2019-nCoV nucleic analysis of different organic examples during the treatment of confirmed COVID-19 cases: The positive rate of 2019-nCoV nucleic analysis of nasopharyngeal swab is 38.13 percent (180/472 times), the positive rate of 2019-nCoV nucleic analysis of sputum is 48.68 percent (148/304 times), the positive rate of 2019-nCoV nucleic analysis of blood is 3.03 percent (4/132 times), and the positive rate of 2019-nCoV nucleic basic analysis of dung is 9.83 In butt-centric swabs, the positive rate of 2019-nCoV nucleic corrosive recognition is 10.00 percent (12/120 times).
The positive rate of 2019-nCoV nucleic corrosive in sputum of 132 patients with COVID-19 was higher than that of nasopharyngeal swabs in this review, and viral nucleic acids were also identified in blood and the intestinal system (waste/butt-centric swabs). Although the positive rate of nasopharyngeal swab 2019-nCoV nucleic corrosive recognition is not high, multi-test 2019-nCoV nucleic corrosive recognition can improve exactness, reduce false negative rates, better aid clinical treatment, and assess the restorative impact.
Reference
Zhang, W., Du, R. H., Li, B., Zheng, X. S., Yang, X. L., Hu, B., ... & Zhou, P. (2020). Molecular and serological investigation of 2019-nCoV infected patients: implication of multiple shedding routes. Emerging microbes & infections, 9(1), 386-389.