question archive 18) For one to be a "philosopher "it's necessary for that person to be a lover of all wisdom and not merely wisdom of a certain kind
18) For one to be a "philosopher "it's necessary for that person to be a lover of all wisdom and not merely wisdom of a certain kind
Subject:PhilosophyPrice:9.82 Bought3
18) For one to be a "philosopher "it's necessary for that person to be a lover of all wisdom and not
merely wisdom of a certain kind . 19 . Glaucon objects to Socrates 'definition of a philosopher on grounds it
would allow too many weird people to rule .
Purchase A New Answer
Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts
GET A QUOTE
Answer Preview
- 18). TRUE.
- 19). TRUE.
Step-by-step explanation
- 18). It is true that for a person to be a philosopher, it's crucial for that individual to be a lover of all wisdom and not merely a wisdom of a particular kind. However, even the definition of philosopher is described to be "lover of wisdom" meaning that, for you to become a philosopher, you must love wisdom and not generally of a certain subject.
- 19). It is true that Glaucon criticizes to Socrates' description of a philosopher on basis it would permit too many weird persons to become rulers. This objection by Glaucon asserts that the definition of a philosopher by Socrates was dubious and that it would mean that many strange and unreal people will end up becoming rulers.
